Speeches & Floor Statements
Posted on October 7, 2009
Mr. President, it is always a privilege to hear the assistant Democratic leader, who is one of the most skillful orators in the Senate. In this case, he needs to be because he is put in the awkward position of having to defend, as I heard him, 1,000-page bills and Medicare cuts, which is an awkward place for the assistant Democratic leader to be. As far as the Republican plan, he has heard our plan many times. We want to reduce costs. Instead of 1,0000-page bills and changing the whole system and adding to the debt and cutting Medicare and raising premiums for millions of Americans, we would like to say our goal is to reduce costs -- costs to you when you buy your health insurance and the cost of your government. We would like to go step by step in the right direction, which we say is reducing costs and re-earning the trust of the American people, and then we can take some more steps. We have offered a number of proposals to do that, none of which have been seriously considered. For example, small businesses should be able to pool their resources the way big businesses can. If they could, they could afford to offer insurance -- it has been estimated by the Congressional Budget Office -- to millions more Americans. We should make a serious effort to eliminate junk lawsuits against doctors, which everyone agrees adds costs to the insurance premiums we buy and to the cost of health care. We could allow Americans to purchase insurance across State lines. We could create health insurance exchanges so if you are buying an individual policy, you could buy that more easily. We can go across party lines to encourage the use of more technology. Almost all Republicans and I imagine some Democrats would like to change the incentives behind health spending, so we take the money we are using to subsidize health insurance now and spread it more equitably among all the people and allow them to buy more of their own insurance. Those are five or six steps we could take in the direction of cutting costs. Instead, what we are presented with is, yes, another 1,000-page bill.. We have some questions about the bill because it appears -- we know it will cut your Medicare, and I want to go back to that in a moment -- half the bill will be paid for by Medicare cuts. Forty million seniors depend on Medicare. Are we going to cut grandma's Medicare? We are not even going to spend it on grandma. We are going to spend it on a new program, at a time when the trustees of the Medicare Program have told us Medicare is going to go broke between 2015 and 2017. We are going to raise your taxes. That is what the bill coming toward us would be. We are going to make it hard for your States to support colleges and education or raise your State taxes because we are sending the bill to them for a large Medicaid expansion. For millions of Americans, we are going to increase your premiums. We are going to make it more expensive for you to buy the same kind of policy you already have because the government is going to tell you exactly what kind of policy you should have. We are going to increase your Federal debt because the plan, as we hear about it, does not have any provision for paying doctors serving Medicare more over the next 10 years -- which we always do -- so that is another $285 billion on your debt, just if we pay doctors 10 years from now what we pay them today for the government-run programs. We are going to spend another $1 trillion. And, yes, it is a 1,000-page bill. So we what we are saying is, we have had before this Senate for a long time a number of proposals we could use to reduce your cost when you buy health insurance and reduce the cost of your Federal Government, which is going broke because of health care expenses, but they are not being seriously considered. So we are saying, at least if you are going to come up with these 1,000-page bills to change our entire system, we want to read it and we want to know what it costs. Even the President has said we cannot add one dime to the deficit. How can we know we are not adding one dime to the deficit if we cannot read the bill and we do not know what it costs? Senator Bunning of Kentucky brought up that in the Finance Committee the other day, and the Democrats voted it down. They said you cannot even put the bill up for 72 hours -- this 1,000-page bill -- so we can find out if it cuts your Medicare, if it raises your taxes, if it bankrupts your State, if it increases your premium, if it increases the Federal debt. We cannot even find that out. They said: No, not even 72 hours. Well, some Democratic Senators have taken a look at that and said -- the Democrats who voted that down; and every vote against the 72-hour provision was a Democratic vote -- they said: We do not agree with that. Eight Democrats have written Senator Reid, and they said: The legislative text and the complete Congressional Budget Office scores of the health care legislation, as amended, should be made available to the public for 72 hours prior to the vote on the final passage of the bill in the Senate. Further, the legislative text of all amendments filed and offered for debate should be posted on a public Web site prior to beginning debate on the amendment on the Senate floor. The conference report ought to be as well. I think what that means, in plain English, is that once the Finance Committee bill -- which is not a bill now; it is just concepts -- goes into Majority Leader Reid's office, and he puts it together with the HELP Committee bill, which will be turned into legislative text, we would like for that to be on the Internet for 72 hours so we in the Senate and our staffs and the American people can read it. Second, we want to make sure the Congressional Budget Office has a chance to read the entire bill so some staff member does not change it in the middle of the night, as they apparently did with the HELP Committee bill, and we can know exactly how much each of the provisions cost, and then we can start voting, then we can offer our amendments. As the Republican leader was saying today, some of our amendments are going to have to do with Medicare, the program that 40 million seniors depend on. Let's be clear about this. Some things are facts. Half the bill is going to be paid for by Medicare cuts. Half the bill is going to be paid for by Medicare cuts. You can call them anything you want to, but they are Medicare cuts. The second thing about it is, it may be grandma's Medicare we are cutting, but we are going to spend it on somebody other than grandma. We are going to take that money out of the Medicare Program, which is a $38 trillion unfunded liability and which the trustees say is going to go broke in 2017 and which 40 million Americans depend on, and we are going to take those savings and we are not going to spend it to make Medicare stronger; we are going to spend grandma's Medicare benefits on somebody else. We are going to cut her benefits and spend it on you. Does that make sense? We don't think so. We don't think so. We don't think we should be paying for this new $1 trillion bill by writing a check, as the Senator from Kansas has said, on an overdrawn bank account and buying a new car, which is what that turns out to be. The Republican leader talked about what the cuts are to Medicare Advantage: $140 million. One-fourth of seniors on Medicare have Medicare Advantage accounts. Cuts include $150 billion for hospitals that care for seniors; $40 billion, home health agencies; $8 billion, hospices -- all from Medicare to be spent on something else. The President said people who are currently signed up for Medicare Advantage are going to have Medicare at the same level of benefits. Well, we want to read the bill and know what it costs because that is not what the Congressional Budget Office Director said. He testified that seniors under Medicare Advantage would have benefits that disappear under the bill that is coming out of the Finance Committee. He said those changes would reduce extra benefits such as dental, vision, and hearing coverage that currently are made available to beneficiaries. We want to read the bill. We want to know what it costs. We want to know why we are cutting Medicare by $1/2 trillion -- that is the first question -- and the second question is, Why are we spending that money on something else when it ought to be spent on making Medicare stronger? The bill has $1/2 trillion in savings from Medicare. At least they could take that money and use it toward the money we pay to physicians. I mentioned it a little earlier, but every year physicians say: The government-run program of Medicare only pays us 80 percent of what private insurance plans pay us, and you are about to cut that. So we almost always, on a bipartisan basis, put it back up. That is not in the bill. We don't even include that. We don't take that into account. So that is going to add to the debt. Then there are other questions we have in addition to the Medicare cuts. What about the elegantly called "doc fix" that will add to the debt? It is the Medicaid Program. To some people, that may get a little confusing. Medicare is for seniors. Medicaid is the program that usually has a different name in most States. It is a program that started years ago, and the Federal Government pays 40, 45 percent of it and the States pay the rest. It has been going straight to the Moon. According to the New York Times, costs are rising in Medicaid this year at record rates -- 7.9 percent. I know as a former Governor, here is what really happens. You sit there making up your budgets, and you do the part for prisons and you do the part for kindergarten through the 12th grade and the part for highways and the part for State parks, and then the rest of the money is usually split between higher education and Medicaid. Guess what is happening. Medicaid goes up and higher education doesn't get the money. Then what happens? College tuition goes up because colleges such as the University of Tennessee and Texas and New Mexico and Colorado are underfunded today primarily because of increasing Medicaid costs. What this bill does is dump a lot more low-income Americans into that Medicaid Program and send a lot of the bill to the States. The Governor of Tennessee, a Democrat, said in the morning paper that it is going to cost us $735 million at least -- maybe over $1 billion -- over the next 5 years. Tennessee can't afford that. Tennessee is a conservative, well-managed State. Governor Schwarzenegger has said that in California it could be up to $8 billion. California is already nearly bankrupt. The Democratic Governor of Michigan has said he doesn't see how they can pay for this. The Governors of every State have said to us: Mr. Senator, Mr. Congressman, if you want to expand Medicaid, if you want to expand Medicaid, pay for it; pay for it in Washington, don't send it to us. So we are looking forward to reading this bill. We are looking forward to knowing what it costs. We have our proposals. I will be glad to spend some time on the floor with the assistant Democratic leader and talk with him about the Republican proposals to take us step by step toward reducing health care costs, first for you and your premiums and next for your government, and why we are skeptical of this 1,000-page bill. But we at least want to know what it costs. We at least want to know why it is cutting Medicare by half-trillion-dollar, and if it is being cut, why is grandma's Medicare cut being spent on some new program. We would like to know how much does it raise your taxes. We would like to be able to tell you what it is going to do to your State's education system and to your State taxes. We would like to be able to tell millions of Americans: Will this really raise your premiums instead of lowering them and will it really increase your Federal debt? So we are grateful eight Democratic Senators have joined us in saying to the majority leader: Let's make sure this bill is finally a bill that will give us all the language before us, that it is on the Internet for 72 hours, and that we know exactly what the provisions cost -- all of that before we have our first vote. I thank the President, and I yield the floor.