Washington Post - David Broder
Call it an early Christmas gift. A number of legislators of both parties have put the wrappings on a proposal for next year that could be the best present under President Bush's tree: an initiative that would please business, labor, parents, teachers and students -- and be good for the country.
Inside the package is a creation framed by the best scientific minds to keep the United States in the forefront of innovation and technology. It is aimed at ensuring this country's competitive position in the new global economy and thereby improving the prospects for more American families to be able to enjoy comfortable, middle-class lives.
The elements have been embraced by key legislators across the political spectrum. But none of them has a personal stamp on the proposal that would prevent the president from making it his own -- if he decided to highlight it, as some of them have suggested, in next month's State of the Union address
and then underscored his commitment by putting the needed funds into his budget.
The major parts of the plan have emerged in a series of reports from business, academic and government groups -- most recently in that of a blue-ribbon panel of the National Academy of Sciences headed by Norman Augustine, the retired chief executive of Lockheed Martin Corp.
They all recite similar warning signs that America's current economic health conceals significant long-term threats to our prosperity. There has been a steady erosion in investment in the kind of brainpower that keeps a nation competitive -- and a consequent decline in American inventiveness.
The percentage of America's gross national product invested by the federal government in research in the physical sciences has declined by half since 1970. Asia and Europe are graduating thousands more engineering and science majors than the United States every year -- and the gap is growing. Almost half of U.S. patents go to foreign-owned companies and foreign-born inventors. Our high school students test poorly in math and science compared with those of our major trading partners.
Looking at these statistics and listening to educators and business executives who offer personal testimony about the difficulty of attracting students to math and engineering or recruiting workers with those skills, legislators are beginning to respond. Three House Republicans -- Reps. Frank Wolf of Virginia, Vern Ehlers of Michigan and Sherwood Boehlert of New York -- sponsored an "innovation summit" this month that brought university presidents and corporate chief executives to the Commerce Department to promote action on this challenge.
The House Democratic Caucus has launched its own task force on innovation, and last week, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi held a meeting of its members with Silicon Valley executives.
Things are moving even faster in the Senate. Republican Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Democrat Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, along with Republican Pete Domenici of New Mexico and Democrat Barbara Mikulski of Maryland, are preparing legislation that embodies the recommendations of the Augustine task force. Connecticut Democrat Joe Lieberman and Nevada Republican John Ensign have teamed up on a related bill.
They call for a coordinated and sustained attack on the problem, one that Alexander and Bingaman say would cost the country about $9 billion a year. That is no small sum, but it is about one-tenth of what the Iraq war has been costing us annually.
The first step, Alexander says, is to boost federal investment in basic research 10 percent a year over the next seven years. Next, tackle the talent supply problem: Recruit 10,000 future science and math teachers each year and award them four-year college scholarships, with big bonuses to those who teach in underserved schools; give additional training to 250,000 current math and science teachers; provide large grants to 200 promising young researchers; create an advanced research projects agency in the Energy Department; provide 25,000 competitive scholarships a year to undergraduates in physical sciences, engineering and math; fund 5,000 new graduate fellowships a year in those fields; make it easier for foreign students in those fields to obtain visas for study here and ease their way if they want to remain here to work; expand immigration opportunities for people with those needed skills; provide tax incentives for U.S.-based innovations; and expand access to broadband communications.
This is a large order, but much more practical than Bush's earlier promise of a manned mission to Mars. Alexander quotes his mentor, the late Bryce Harlow, an Eisenhower aide, who taught him that "everything that comes to the White House is important, but only a few things are presidential." This, says Alexander, is presidential. And it's there for Bush's taking.